Or so the saying goes, and Japan has been in crisis mode for much of
the last year. That said, while radioactive contamination fears remain,
and economic downturn is causing some pain, you could be forgiven for
thinking that the impact of the March 11, 2011 triple-disaster on the
country has been negligible. Life seemingly rolls on as normal.
I don’t say that lightly mind you, particularly given the tragic loss
of life during the earthquake and tsunami, as well as the ongoing
threat to health from radiation exposure. But only three of Japan’s 54
nuclear reactors remain online, and come April, there very well may be
no nuclear plants running at all, and the impact on society here will
remain all but invisible.
Sure, some of the bright advertising lights of Tokyo have been dimmed
to conserve power, and some large companies are complaining of
increased energy costs, but in a country built on huge power excesses,
where there’s a vending machine serving hot or cold drinks on virtually
every street, and heated toilet seats in almost every home, there are
many places power savings can be made without hurting standard of
living.
Increased costs for business shouldn’t be shrugged off of course.
People need jobs, and as a huge importer of goods to support its way of
life Japan needs to power its business and manufacturing sector.
However, for 90% of Japan’s manufacturing sector, energy costs make up a mere 3% of total production costs. No one wants to pay more, but increases in energy prices are hardly a show-stopper, and could be solved relatively fast by more aggressive energy efficiency measures and utilisation of Japan’s barely-tapped renewable potential.
But back to this amazing situation with nuclear power: This time last
year, around 30% of Japan’s energy came from nuclear. Given this source
of energy has disappeared virtually overnight and there have been no
significant problems for society the question must be seriously asked:
does Japan really need nuclear?
It certainly isn’t needed in the long-term, as Japan’s population is expected to drop by more than a third by 2060.
Averaged out, that’s around 875,000 less people using energy every year
for the next 48 years, which makes the governments recently announced
plans to extend the lifetimes of nuclear plants and allow them to keep working at the ripe old age of 60 years in one of the most seismically active countries on earth old beyond a little ridiculous.
Speaking of quakes, the University of Tokyo's Earthquake Research Institute is strongly predicting that there is a 90% risk of another severe earthquake striking
within four years, and a 98% chance of it happening within 30 years.
This not only makes restarting reactors a risky proposition for the
stability of power supply and the economy, it keeps the threat of
another Fukushima-like disaster unnecessarily hanging over the people of
this country.
The nuclear lobby, big business, and the Japanese government are
pushing hard to restart reactors claiming it is for the health of the
economy, but while excess power once helped Japan grow rapidly, nuclear
has not saved Japan’s economy from decline, and it’s not going to save it now.
By remaining wedded to nuclear the government will be simply playing a
game of dice with Japan’s economic future, and the health and safety of
its people. It should instead be using this moment of upheaval to end
its unhealthy relationship with nuclear utilities like TEPCO, and
embrace energy solutions that will keep its people safe, help it stick
to greenhouse gas reduction targets, and give its economy a huge boost
with a green industry revolution.
The Fukushima disaster created a contamination crisis, but not an
energy crisis. It kick-started an identity crisis, destroying Japan’s
image as the poster child for a mythical clean and safe nuclear society,
and turning it into yet another cautionary tale of the risks
governments take on with atomic snake oil salesmen. But it’s not too
late. With the remaining three reactors due to go into shutdown over the
next month, a nuclear free summer approaches, and a nuclear free future
awaits.
No comments:
Post a Comment